Table of content
Even the most advanced systems become outdated with time. They start to silently drain resources from the business, taking away growth opportunities and user comfort. At that moment, businesses opt for legacy software modernization, but, in many cases, they don’t know which way is more efficient.
On one hand, outsourcing saves money, accesses specialized experts, and accelerates product-to-market. Consequently, the IT outsourcing market is anticipated to generate $588.38 billion in revenue in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.99%, to reach a 30% increase by 2028. On the other hand, maintaining an in-house team is often more suitable for long-term proprietary projects due to the need for sustained control and alignment with company culture.
This article will help you choose the best course of modernization for your company, sorting out the alternatives. Whether it is in-house or outsourced development, we’ll break down the benefits and downsides. Ready to start? Let’s get down to the point.
What Is the Difference: In-House Development vs Outsourcing?
“Modernizing legacy systems is less about replacing what’s old and more about unlocking future potential.” — Martin Fowler, ThoughtWorks
In-house development means that you rely on your company’s staff and resources. Although it gives you complete control over the process, there is still the question of whether you can get the best specialists. Delegating or outsourcing such duties to outside vendors could be leaner and quicker. Let’s compare the main differences between the two approaches.
In-house | Outsourcing | |
Control | Macro and micro control of resource allocation, procedures, and decision-making | The client is involved only in strategic operations and decision-making |
Communication | Direct and immediate | Coordinated mode, through a project manager and/or a head of delivery, team lead |
Expertise | Internal training | Access to the latest legacy modernization software technology and best practices without long recruiting and hiring processes |
Costs | Initial investment and ongoing overhead costs are higher | Costs vary depending on the team choice and project scope |
Time | Hiring and training need time and infrastructure | Quick setup is possible |
Flexibility | Scaling is limited | Easily scaled up and down |
As you can see, in-house development offers full control and seamless internal communication but often comes with higher costs, slower setup, and limited flexibility.
Outsourcing, conversely, is about faster execution, scalable resources, and access to specialized expertise. Though it may require more structured communication and oversight.
In-House Development: Advantages
While developing applications in internal teams, businesses control the entire product lifetime. Moreover, it’s not the only benefit. Let’s unwrap the complete list:
- Dividends from Talents: Since internal staff share corporate culture and non-financial motivation, investing in their skills and knowledge will provide long-term advantages. For instance, seasoned specialists are better equipped to explain the implications of legacy software system modernization.
- Operational Control: Having an internal staff gives you more control over workflows and procedures. In line with strategic objectives, the organization more successfully enforces its standards and procedures with internal hires.
- Work Continuity: There is no need for lengthy onboarding because internal staff members are already familiar with the company’s culture and procedures. The staff turnover is gradual, so the knowledge is passed seamlessly.
- Social Capital: As workers share their knowledge and ideas, trust and familiarity among coworkers promote improved cooperation and communication.
To put it briefly, through shared knowledge and incremental staff changes, in-house growth promotes deeper alignment with business goals, guarantees smoother collaboration, and creates enduring team cohesion. However, this method has its downsides. Let’s examine them.
In-House Development: Disadvantages
Despite many pros, in-house development brings notable operational and financial challenges:
- High Costs: Building and sustaining an internal team involves major investments in terms of organization, recruitment, infrastructure, including office space, equipment, and licenses.
- Limited Talent Access: When you hire only local candidates, your access to niche or highly specialized expertise is limited, restricting innovation and reducing competitiveness.
- Slower Execution: If your current staff lacks specific experience, expect delays in training, process setup, and delivery schedules, slowing your time to market.
That’s where outsourcing becomes a valuable alternative, offering faster access to skilled talent, cost-effective operations, and the agility to scale as needed.
Outsourcing: Advantages
Outsourcing software development has become a go-to strategy to get ultimate speed, flexibility, and cost efficiency. Thus, delegating certain tasks to specialized external providers, while companies focus on core strategic priorities, is a brilliant idea. Moreover, we can add to the list the following benefits:
- Cost Efficiency: With no need to hire full-time employees, companies save significantly on recruitment and training.
- Access to Best: Outsourcing connects you with a worldwide network of specialists regardless of domain, without the delays and limitations of local hiring.
- Increased Productivity: Well-established Agile workflows are common for external teams, allowing quicker and more precise delivery.
- Reduced HR Burden: Your HR team concentrates on strategic personnel goals without the need to handle hiring, onboarding, retention, and employee relations.
However, talking about outsourcing is impossible without its challenges. Let’s look at potential drawbacks that companies should be prepared for.
Outsourcing: Disadvantages
By managing outsourcing risks upfront, you’ll not only avoid pitfalls but also turn your outsourcing partner into a high-performing extension of your team. But let’s face the truth, we need to be aware of the following:
- Lack of Control: Delegating responsibilities to a third party makes it harder to keep an eye on day-to-day operations or react swiftly to changes without additional checkpoints.
- Communication Issues: Delays, miscommunications, or misplaced expectations result from different time zones and cultural variances.
- Quality Concerns: Apart from the constant need to check the quality, rework or missing deadlines happen more often.
For companies considering outsourcing, these disadvantages highlight the importance of choosing the right partner, one that aligns with your communication style, shares your quality expectations, and provides transparency throughout the project lifecycle.
What Is the Cost of In-House IT vs Outsourcing?
Cost is one of the most important considerations. It extends well beyond hourly rates. Here is a summary of the actual cost of outsourcing vs in-house, ranging depending on the project scope, industry, and the project complexity:
In-House Team | Outsource Vendor | |
Recruitment Time | 2–3 months | 1–2 weeks |
Hourly Rates | $80–$150/hr | $50–$80/hr |
Management Overhead | Critical | Low |
Flexibility | Rigid | Flexible |
Hidden Costs (HR, legal) | Often occur | Often Included |
Additional Infrastructure (Office, PC, etc.) | Additional needed | Included |
Although outsourcing rates may differ from country to country, from industry to industry, in-house development usually adds substantial hidden costs. Thus, outsourcing budgets are more transparent and predictable with inherent flexibility and a quicker ramp-up.
When to Choose Outsourcing? 5 Steps To Decide
Outsourcing can be a strategic lever, not just for cost reduction. Here’s how to determine if it’s the right move for your business:
- Step 1. Assess Routine Operations. Outsourcing allows your teams to focus on higher-value innovation and core product development if they are overburdened by maintenance and repetitive tasks.
- Step 2. Align Team Capacity with the Workload. Outsourcing keeps projects moving forward when internal resources are overworked.
- Step 3. Evaluate Needed Skills. Outsourcing allows quick access to capabilities that could take months to develop internally.
- Step 4. “Are There Too Many Offside Needs?” You can refocus your attention and resources on what works by outsourcing them.
- Step 5. Build Your Priorities. Need rapid growth? Agility is necessary. With outsourcing, you may swiftly scale up or down without having to deal with fixed expenditures or drawn-out employment cycles.
When done well, outsourcing is a strategic choice that fosters growth, creativity, and agility. It can be the best option to advance without sacrificing quality or deadlines in many situations.
The Bottom Line
The decision between outsourcing and in-house is never easy, as both approaches have their distinct benefits. While in-house development is known for face-to-face interaction, a shared culture, and complete control, outsourcing, in its turn, offers unmatched cost savings and access to global tech talent. If you thoroughly match the benefits and drawbacks of each with your business goals and strategy, in each case, you will make the right decision.
But if you need a tech partner, Devox Software is here to help. A team of seasoned specialists with advanced skills in the latest techniques and the mindset for innovation and cost-efficiency will take a project of any size and complexity to the next level.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
What is legacy software help?
Code audits, performance optimization, feature enhancement, migration assistance, and modernization strategies creation are examples of legacy software assistance.
-
What’s better: in-house IT or outsourcing?
The answer depends on your objectives. Long-term control and cultural fit are best served by in-house IT. For specialized talents and quick execution, outsourcing is the best option.
-
How do I estimate the cost of outsourcing vs. in-house?
Both direct and hidden costs must be taken into account when estimating the cost difference between in-house development versus outsourcing. Then, make a comparative table with values to decide.
-
Can I mix both models?
Positive. Many businesses employ a hybrid model, with some external teams hired but maintaining internal control throughout development.
-
What if my legacy system is too old to modernize?
Even if your system remains unchanged for 20 years, there is still room for improvement. Start with an assessment. Using microservices for legacy software modernization can frequently reanimate (in rehosting and partial replacement) even outdated systems.