Security Code Review and Dependency Analysis Services

Automated scanners flag patterns, but they don’t understand your business logic. Authorization flaws, broken trust boundaries, and mistakes in AI-generated code often pass them unnoticed.

• Static analysis with triage. We run SAST across your codebase and confirm the results, so your team sees real issues instead of raw scanner output.
• Manual review of high-risk code. Engineers review authentication, authorization, input handling, deserialization, secrets, and trust boundaries line by line.
• AI-generated code. We hold AI-assisted code to the same standard as human-written code, with extra attention to access control and input validation.

Some vulnerabilities only appear when the application is running: misconfigurations, weak session handling, and injection paths through deployed components.

We test the running application to find them:

• Real-time attack simulation. Our tools simulate real-world attacks, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to find vulnerabilities at runtime.
• Behavioral analysis. We test applications in live environments to detect unexpected reactions, misconfigurations, and gaps in session management.
• Testing in the release cycle. We add DAST to your pipeline, so each new version is tested before it reaches production.

IAST observes the application from the inside while it runs, confirming which issues are real and pointing to the code behind them.

What this gives your team:

• Precise vulnerability detection. Our specialized tools detect vulnerabilities at runtime and provide real-time insights into application issues, including injection flaws and insecure deserialization.
• Clarity on root cause. Each finding is traced to the exact file and line, shortening debugging and keeping fixes targeted.
• Developer-friendly integration. IAST runs inside your CI/CD pipeline and produces far fewer false positives than scanning alone, so findings don’t stall releases.

For product owners, releasing a mobile app means not only meeting user expectations but also protecting sensitive user data and avoiding costly compliance issues and reputational damage. The complexity of platform-specific security concerns for iOS and Android often creates blind spots that could expose your app to threats.

We specialize in mobile application security testing to overcome these critical challenges:

• Platform-specific code review. iOS and Android have fundamentally different security architectures, and treating them the same leaves gaps on both sides. Our analysis respects each platform’s sandboxing model, permission system, and update mechanisms.
• Runtime threat analysis. Through dynamic testing, we identify threats such as insecure data storage, weak encryption, and API vulnerabilities in real-world scenarios.
• Reverse engineering resistance. We check how easily your app can be decompiled or modified and recommend obfuscation and anti-tampering measures where they’re needed.

According to Black Duck’s Open Source Security and Risk Analysis report, 84% of audited codebases contained at least one known open-source vulnerability.

We offer a proactive approach to managing open-source and third-party risks:

• Complete dependency inventory. We identify every direct and transitive component in your application and document it in an SBOM.
• Known-vulnerability matching. Each component is checked against public vulnerability databases, then ranked by exploit likelihood (EPSS) and whether the vulnerable code is actually reachable in your application.
• Version assessment. Outdated and unsupported library versions are flagged, with a recommended upgrade path.
  Continuous monitoring. Scanning runs in your CI pipeline and alerts your team when a new vulnerability is published for a library you use.

Discovering a license conflict late in the development cycle can halt progress and disrupt the time-to-market schedule. Worse still, deploying improperly licensed software in production can trigger financial penalties and erode stakeholder confidence.

We map every license in your dependency tree and flag the ones that conflict with how you ship your product:

• Dependency License Mapping. We create a comprehensive inventory of the licenses associated with your dependencies.
• Risk assessment. We identify incompatible, restrictive, or high-risk licenses such as GPL or AGPL that could conflict with your company’s licensing policies or business model.
• Customized compliance reports. Our analysis highlights problem areas and provides actionable recommendations to resolve license conflicts while maintaining compliance.
• Checks on new dependencies. License compatibility is checked automatically when a new package enters the codebase.
• Version locking. We enforce version control best practices to ensure consistency and avoid unexpected errors.

Vague or overly technical reports can delay remediation and leave critical vulnerabilities unaddressed.

What you receive:

• Clear breakdown of vulnerabilities. Each report categorizes vulnerabilities by type and severity and highlights critical risks that require immediate action.
• Remediation roadmap. We provide a step-by-step guide to efficiently remediate vulnerabilities and ensure fixes align with your codebase and project goals.
• Fix verification. After your team applies fixes, we retest them and update the report.