AI Harness
A control layer that defines what AI can access, where human approval is required, and checks outputs before they reach production workflows.
Most AI budgets are spent before anyone knows whether the use case pays back. We start with a focused pilot on your real business data with clear KPIs, acceptance criteria and an ROI target, then build the production system around evaluation, approvals and audit trails.
Each stage ends with a written result your finance, security and risk teams can review before you decide on the next one.
Every use case gets a revenue or cost hypothesis and a success metric, or it is removed from the shortlist.
A focused pilot for one high-value problem, such as a copilot, an assistant or a governed workflow.
Enterprise-grade retrieval, role-based access and full LLMOps and MLOps in day-to-day operations.
A prototype that answers well in a meeting and a system that can be trusted with customer-facing decisions are different pieces of engineering.
Work is contracted in short packages of one to three weeks. The pilot itself spans several of them.
We use AI-assisted development throughout delivery, and we measure it per task rather than applying one blanket discount. Overall project gains land around 10 to 30 percent even with near-universal tool adoption, while specific task types genuinely run twice as fast.
| Work type | AI impact | What the human keeps |
|---|---|---|
| Type definitions, scaffolding, configuration | 60–80% faster | Correctness review |
| Converting framework-free business logic | 70–90% faster | Parity test sign-off |
| Simple and static pages | 50–60% faster | Visual QA |
| UI components and state management | 40–50% faster | Design fidelity and accessibility |
| Complex flows and integrations | ~30% faster | Business-logic validation |
| Verifying the live system behaves correctly | ~0% | All of it |
What AI does not replace: architectural decisions, product judgment, cross-browser testing, accessibility review and integration debugging. Every AI-generated output is reviewed and validated by an experienced developer before it enters the codebase. The published cases where AI rewrote a whole system in days had one thing in common, an existing test suite complete enough to judge every change automatically. Where that automatic verdict exists, the work runs at machine pace. Where the verdict is a human looking at a live system, verification sets the clock, and skipping it is paid back in production bugs.
A control layer that defines what AI can access, where human approval is required, and checks outputs before they reach production workflows.
A structured evaluation framework with automated metrics, curated test sets and red-team exercises.
Continuous security validation before release, including code scanning and database access validation.
Cost budgets with early-exit signals prevent runaway token spend, so you can track cost per task.
A model is one layer. What makes it usable in a regulated business is everything around it.
Where data cannot leave your environment, the system runs in a private or on-premise setup, and redaction layers keep sensitive information inside approved boundaries. The assessment states which parts of the stack your case actually needs, rather than every item on this list.
An AI layer on the existing customer service stack, trained on 50,000+ historical interactions.
AI extraction from invoices, packing lists and transport tables, with confidence scoring for manual review.
Automated prospect research, validation and outreach preparation with human-in-the-loop workflows.
The pilot runs 4 to 6 weeks on your real business data, with clear KPIs, acceptance criteria and an ROI target set before development expands, so you see proof before committing to a full rollout.
Yes. The readiness assessment inventories every significant data source, profiles quality and flags what is usable for AI before a pilot runs, so the pilot is scoped around data that exists rather than data you wish you had.
High-risk actions require human approval, sensitive data stays within defined access boundaries, and every component creates an audit trail your team can review. A control layer defines what the system is allowed to access and checks outputs before they reach production workflows.
The assessment includes an inference cost model at your expected transaction volume. In delivery we right-size models for each task, cache frequent responses and route simpler queries to lighter models, with cost budgets and early-exit signals in place.
An agentic AI MVP takes 10 to 16 weeks and ships all 9 layers of the production stack with a 10-metric evaluation suite as a standard deliverable.
Artificial intelligence services cover a wide range, so it is worth being concrete. In practice the work falls into four shapes: an assistant or copilot on your own content, document and data extraction, a governed agent that performs work inside your systems, and machine learning models on your operational data. The AI software development around the model, integration, evaluation, access control and cost management, is usually the larger part, and it is what decides whether AI solutions survive their first quarter in production.
Yes. The stack runs in a private or on-premise environment where required, with redaction layers preventing sensitive information from leaving approved boundaries.
Model and prompt versions are managed like code: a new version is promoted only after automated checks and human review, with the evaluation suite proving the behavior did not regress, and drift detection triggering retraining when inputs shift.
30 minutes on your use case, data and systems, and what a 4–6 week pilot would need to prove before anyone signs off a rollout.